Yesterday the news broke that Bill Simmons was suspended from Twitter by ESPN for a few days after his public criticism of First Take.
The immediate reaction volleyed back and forth and around in circles between several interpretations of the importance of the news...
-Simmons got what was coming to him for criticizing a colleague.
-Nobody is bigger than ESPN, even Simmons.
-ESPN was suppressing free speech to protect Skip Bayless.
-Embrace Debate is a red herring.
-3 days away from Twitter is probably a good thing.
-Who gives a sh*t?
Let's be real - telling someone not to tweet for three days shouldn't even count as any kind of real punishment. ESPN might as well have told Bill Simmons he couldn't have his ice cream unless he also ate his fruits and veggies. It's not even a slap on the wrist. It's a firm pat on the shoulder with a stern paternal glare. There's no real consequence, ESPN just had to give him a brief, enforced vacation from Twitter for breaking one of their rules and hoped it was short enough that nobody would blab or notice.
Unfortunately for Bristol, someone did blab to Deadspin's John Koblin and "ESPN SUSPENDS BILL SIMMONS" headlines were rampant. While #FreeSimmons didn't quite turn into #FreeBruce, the episode is not a good look for ESPN no matter how you spin it. It gives the impression that there's no room to speak freely about concerns over the network's downward spiral and exposes the "Embrace Debate" concept as the fraud it is. After all, how can ESPN gleefully promote Richard Sherman calling Skip Bayless every name in the book but run the opposite direction when Bill Simmons offers tepid criticism of the same premise? It creates a cognitive dissonance in the minds of ESPN's viewers and followers that is all too common these days. Criticism of Skip Bayless is apparently only a good thing when it increases ratings and feeds into the carnival sideshow that is further cementing its status as the worst show produced by ESPN in its 30+ year history with each passing day.
But with all that said, we missed the forest for the trees with the real importance of Bill Simmons' Twitter suspension.
The central issue for ESPN isn't their biggest star and "spiritual leader" talking out of turn and aiming a couple critical tweets at Skip Bayless. It's the fact that ESPN's spiritual leader was so offended by the atrocity that is First Take that he had to speak out publicly. The Sherman-Bayless debacle was so unseemly, such a black mark on ESPN's brand, that Bill Simmons had to say something to send a message, probably knowing he'd be asked to stay off Twitter for a few days before he sent those tweets.
Bill Simmons taking a few days off Twitter does nothing to address the real problem at ESPN - the slow and steady decline of ESPN's reputation. "Embrace Debate" is no longer confined to First Take, it's infected ESPN's other studio shows like a noxious gas with no end in sight.
Suspending Simmons for violating ESPN's social media policy is like trying to save a sinking boat by throwing water overboard with dixie cups. ESPN is doing nothing to plug the hole and address the real problem. The hole is First Take. And it's a sinkhole that is rapidly swallowing ESPN's credibility.
The criticism of First Take isn't about being a "hater," it's about wanting and demanding for ESPN to be better than our lowest common denominator. It's about expecting more from a company that likes to call themselves the worldwide leader in sports than diving into the gutter with awful content that makes Maury look refined and sophisticated. That was the message Bill Simmons needed to send to everyone in Bristol and beyond.
In December, ESPN President John Skipper said he wasn't concerned with the tidal waves of criticism affecting ESPN's brand in an interview with SBJ:
“The brand’s never been stronger. We care most about our brand with fans. We have no choice but to worry about our brand with our friends in the media and with advertisers and with business people. ... If you do the old concentric circle thing, of course the stuff that happens inside the figurative Beltway, happens first then it moves outward. We never want to wait until it gets to the edge. It hasn’t gotten to the edge. Am I concerned it’s getting there? No. But am I concerned enough to try and react and do things differently? Yes.”
Thanks to the embarrassing Sherman-Bayless debacle and Bill Simmons' Twitter drama, the damage done to ESPN's brand is closer to the edge than ever before.
First of all, you f*cked your metaphor. The hole is not First Take. The hole is ESPN's perversion of sports journalism. It's not any different from everyone's hatred of our mainstream news media: narrative driven, personal bias, conflicts of interest, unprofessional debates, etc. I mean, look at ABC news! It's the same thing! Doesn't anyone notice this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Please, for the love of sports, no one watch ESPN unless it's a game broadcast. I always go to yahoo sports. Yes, I know it sucks - but it's not ESPN.
@awfulannouncing great read. Spot on
@SportsbySharona ESPN has bitten the curb time and again, but Bill Simmons is an idiot of the most clueless sort for doing that.
@SportsbySharona you publicly call out your boss in the private sector, you'll be lucky to have a job not a 3-day twitter suspension.
I think most of us anxiously await the day when FS1 and NBCSN finally threaten the ESPN throne. I don't find it to be a coincidence that seemingly, they can't keep talent to save their lives right now. Andrews, Beadle, Jenn Brown, Rome, Bucher, Dana Jacobsen have all left within the past 16 months.
@awfulannouncing the real issue is why anyone cares. ESPN has turned into a bad soap opera.
@awfulannouncing Well said.
It isn't just ESPN that is going all out in trolling for the "lowest common denominator," it is nearly every channel. It started with MTV years ago and has spread everywhere from CNN to the History Channel to Discovery to lately even The Weather Channel and its incredible overhype every time a snowflake hits the pavement somewhere.
This is the modern era of idiot-driven American television, and it is just going to get worse.
Simmons is possibly the only voice of reason ESPN has outside of Bob Ley. While he likely knew what the consequences would be, I commend him for speaking his mind in spite of this. ESPN is holier than thou. Simmons is real. I hope he keeps it up.....
what skipper doesn't realize and could figure out if he did some focus groups/market research...the brand's prestige has taken a hit over the last 2 years. It's not just social media and blogs, the average ESPN fan is yearning for a real competitor.
I don't watch First Take, only because of Bayless and the hack that he is, but it sounds like Jerry Springer in a sports setting. As much as people can't stand Springer look how long he has been on the air. There is a big difference between debate and just yelling and ranting for show.
'Embrace debate' started with that sham segment on Sportscenter where Salisbury and Clayton would debate the NFL and Salisbury would fake anger at Clayton. First Take just made it a whole show.
@gothlaw look I didn't write it ok. I am going to read it but gimme a break. ESPN is known for its clown shows and for "embracing debate"
@SportsbySharona Oh, I know. I'm more saying that "embracing debate" has NEVER been about whether your bosses suck ;)
@gothlaw i'm just saying its hypocritcal IMO. you still my boo tho :p
@SportsbySharona oh of course. They are sports media after all. All media are subjective as hell.
@gothlaw they cherry pick but what they allow and don't allow IMO