ESPN's New QBR Stat Isn't Perfect After All

Back in August we told you about ESPN's new Total Quarterback Rating, just their next step on the road to total sports domination. With the laughability of the new metric and the audacity of ESPN to come up with their own statistic to judge the art of quarterbacking, it was only a matter of time before the WWL ended up with egg on their face. I mean, even in THE YEAR OF THE QUARTERBACK, an idea like ESPN's QBR was bound to backfire. Enter Week 5 and two mythological figures... Aaron Rodgers and Tim Tebow.
Yes, ESPN's two favorite quarterbacks. One is deservedly being recognized as the best QB in the league, and yes, I'm talking about Aaron Rodgers. But, somehow, someway, ESPN's infallable ultimate QB metric decided that Rodgers (who was 26/39 for 396 yards and two TDs against Atlanta) was inferior in Week 5 to Jesus Christ Quarterback himself... Tim Tebow. Well, since ESPN's new QBR is so thorough and fantastic, Tebow mush have had one hell of a game! And, looking at the numbers, how could anyone think Rodgers had a better performance than Tebow, who threw for 334 yards, ran for 212 yards, scored 8 total TDs, and rescued children from a burning building in the Broncos comprehensive victory over the Chargers...
Wait... what's that? The Broncos didn't win? And Tebow didn't have 500 yards of offense and 8 TDs? Oh really! You mean he only played half the game? And his stat line was 4/10 for 79 yards, 6 rushes for 38 yards and had two total TDs? Oh... well then yeah, this new ESPN QBR must really be awesome. And don't worry, ESPN isn't incessantly hyping Tebow's QBR rating in their endless, horrifying, nauseating, nonstop TebowMania coverage or anything.
But, the mere fact that ESPN's GREATEST STATISTICAL METRIC TO COMMEMORATE THE YEAR OF THE QUARTERBACK ranked Tim Tebow ahead of Aaron Rodgers isn't laughable enough on its own. On ESPN's Stats & Info Blog (who knew?), there are not one, but two articles justifying why Tebow was ranked ahead of Aaron Rodgers. Now, how great can your shiny new stat be if your stats department has to write two separate blog posts to justify the ranking? To save you the grief, here are five key points supposedly justifying why Tebow ranked ahead of Rodgers and why it doesn't make sense...










