ESPN Gambles On Live Poker Coverage

The dog days of summer are indeed brutal, except for people who follow baseball religiously like Old Hoss Radbourn. Between endless episodes of Baseball Tonight and soccer friendlies, there isn't much going on in terms of sports on TV. However, one of the events ESPN has made a trademark of their summer television is the World Series of Poker. And while the poker boom has been well and truly over for a few years, this summer ESPN made a bold decision to double down (wait, isn't that blackjack?) on more poker than just their normal taped shows.
Throughout the main event, ESPN has shown several hours of live poker coverage, WITHOUT the use of hole card cameras. Wait, no hole card cameras? Isn't that the innovation that started the poker boom with the 2003 WSOP Main Event and the World Poker Tour? With that single innovation, poker went from the television outhouse to ratings royalty because we knew what hands were being played. Just take a look at this archaic clip from the 1998 final table featuring a boyish Vince Van Patten to see what the dark ages of televised poker looked like...
Wow, that was painful to watch. Why would ESPN want to go back to poker coverage like this drudgery? Actually, ESPN's gamble, although received with mixed reviews by most, was a risk worth taking. For one, ESPN dressed up the live coverage with their usual bells and whistles. But, ESPN also made the wise decisions to use seasoned poker pros like Phil Hellmuth and Antonio Esfandiari to provide expert commentary. The analysis from Hellmuth and Esfandiari, although almost impossible to be accurate, took viewers inside the heads of the players during hands. It was truly a learning experience for anyone interested in the game of poker, not just seeing the predictable taped all-ins and bad beats after already knowing the cards in play...














When exactly did ESPN lose its journalistic integrity? It's a difficult question to answer, but one that certainly needs to be asked in light of the 