Throughout the summer months, the rumblings of a feud between attractive, blonde ESPN superstar Erin Andrews and attractive, blonde ESPN superstar Michelle Beadle has sent the internet, and 18-35 year old males particularly, into a frenzy.  It all started when Beadle admitted in the ESPN Book that she watched the infamous Erin Andrews peephole tape and more or less stated that a congenial relationship between the two was non-existent. 

Then came the rumors and reports pitting Beadle and Andrews against one another in some sort of cosmic tug of war over who was the fair-haired favorite inside Bristol headquarters.  Andrews is the wholesome celebrity figure who is as recognizable on Dancing With The Stars or Good Morning America as she is on College Gameday.  Conversely, Beadle is the upstart guys' girl who has burst onto the scene the last couple years on SportsNation and other outlets.  (Hey, I would look a lot better too sitting next to Cowherd five days a week.)

Well, wouldn't you know that rumors of the "feud" intensified when Beadle took on a starring role in the lead-up to this year's ESPY awards.  Deadspin, who has emerged as one of the go-to places for BeadleMania, went to her directly to refute rumors that Beadle was trying her best to relive the sex and drug filled early days of ESPN in Los Angeles after the ESPYs.  Beadle firmly denied the whispers going around the block that she had been involved with Packers stars Aaron Rodgers or Clay Matthews.

Then, a Youtube video came out of Beadle and Matthews... WALKING TOGETHER!!!!  Because you know, when people walk together, there's bound to be something bigger and much more salacious going on.  But the intriguing aspect to the whole Beadle/Packer/ESPY story was that some naughty, nosey person was sneaking around ESPN mongering up all these rumors to begin with.  Beadle expressed her displeasure on Twitter yesterday...

At AA, we are always looking for more ideas to get our readers involved and stay true to Brian Powell's original mission for the site to make it a forum for sports fans to talk about their most and least favorite announcers and as a central place for sports media news and opinion.  The Joe Morgan Memorial Tournament was our way of doing just that, having our readers vote and vote often to place Craig James on our Mount Rushmore.

So now that the Joe Morgan Tourney is over and the Pammies still a month away, we are introducing a new feature at AA - the AA Fan Forum.  This is another way to give you a voice on Awful Announcing.  Most of our work is done on the national scene, but we want to give a spotlight to some of the local professional announcing teams that we may not be able to cover in-depth.  And since we're still rolling through the summer months, we want to focus on the local baseball broadcast booths.

We want you to tell us why you're local MLB announcing teams are either great... or of course, awful.  Tell us why your favorite team's play by play man or analyst, radio booth or TV booth, is the best or worst in the sport.  We want to give you a platform to help us cover these broadcasters in a way that we wouldn't be able to on our own.  Vin Scully not your type?  Tell us why.  Do Thom Brennaman and Jeff Brantley cause you to pour gasoline in your ears and light a match?  Feel free to send in a rant!  Tell us how Len Kasper and Bob Brenly help you cope with another season of Cubs losing.  We'll run your responses periodically throughout the month of August in fan forum posts.  Here's the specifics of what we need from you...

*Send e-mails to awfulannouncing @ gmail.com 
*Include MLB AA Fan Forum in the message subject heading (we get a ton of spam, it's annoying)
*Keep your responses between 150-300 words.
*Remember to keep it clean and your submissions may be edited for spelling, grammar, etc.
*If your submission fits these criteria, it will be considered to be published in the AA Fan Forum.

We're calling fans, bloggers, and even legitimate reporters or sports media people to write in and take part in the AA Fan Forum.  Hope to hear from you soon.
 

Time for your daily episode of The Young & The Bruceless.  In this week's episode, we find out that Lou Holtz is the real father of Adam James, Victor and Jack battle for the future of Newman Enterprises, and Mike Leach continues his scorched earth policy against the "leader."  Leach has been relentless in his continuous mission to blast Bristol, Craig James, James' PR firm, and Texas Tech brass in every way imaginable during the publicity tour for his new book.  In a recent stop, Leach went on Tony Bruno's show and brought out the heavy artilery once again... this time going after ESPN for the neverending controversy surrounding his co-author, Bruce Feldman.  Larry Brown has the full audio from the interview, but it's Leach's choice of words for the [insert pseudo-disciplinary word here] of Bruce Feldman that is most interesting.  Here's Leach's quotes...

“Every step of the way he had permission from ESPN to write it,” Leach said of Feldman. “He has written permission. The chapters they’re sensitive about are all in the words of the perpetrators, so that’s what makes it powerful. Evidently ESPN didn’t like the way it came out — they’re not comfortable with the facts — so [Bruce] did what any journalist would do he wrote the facts down in the appendix of the book.

“ESPN claims they didn’t suspend him. We’re just arguing definitions there. Bruce virtually disappeared, hasn’t written anything, didn’t go to SEC media day. They don’t like the word ‘suspended’ [they] tell you he was never suspended. Perhaps they like the word ‘kidnapped’ better.”

Leach is sticking up for the man that helped him write his book... but ouch... kidnapping might be a little too harsh for the reasonably minded individual.  Although now that I think about it, Dan Akroyd and Daniel Stern very well could have been off camera during Feldman's Pac 12 media day cameo.  

While stories like this continue to trickle out, Bruce Feldman's induced Twitter silence is approaching a month.  With college football season rapidly approaching, this story is going to have to break one way or the other and reach some kind of resolution.  (We hope.)  Either Bruce comes back and truly "resumes his assignments" or he fades away into the Bristol night for good.

While we're at it, let's hope Mike Leach "resumes his assignments" in the broadcast booth this fall as well.

[Larry Brown Sports] 

 

According to the title of this video, the crazy man you'll hear is Atlanta radio personality Beau Bock.  Beau's quite optimistic about the chances of the Atlanta Falcons this season and takes extreme personal offense to anyone that disagrees with him.  When a Falcons fan calls in to try to reasonably take the opposite point of view, Beau goes on a breathless rampage defending his own blatant homerism (DON'T YOU EVER CALL ME A HOMER!!!).  Evidently any Falcon fan that doesn't believe Harry Douglas will be the second incarnation of Jerry Rice this year isn't really a Falcon fan.  What ensues is radio chaos that "Mad Dog" Russo would be proud of...



Beau Bock - TELLING THE TRUTH SINCE 1973 ON ATLANTA RADIO!!!

[H/T Jimmy Traina]

Our armed services don't get enough love from the sporting world. There is always that nice shout-out and sometimes live feed of soldiers abroad watching major US sporting events. Teams often have military appreciation days and of late a lot of coaches have made the trek overseas to visit our troops. However, outside of these moments, the heartfelt acknowledgement and appreciation of our armed services is something we really tend to reserve for special occasions like Memorial Day, Veteran's Day, and to a lesser degree the Army vs Navy football game.

Formally one of college football's most compelling games of the year, the significance of the game has diminished as you rarely find one of the teams in the top 25 and Army has had a pretty rough decade on the gridiron. The games themselves have been a bit lacking as Navy has rattled off 9 straight wins, none of which were even one score games. On the bright side, it seems both programs seem to be on solid footing as Army won their first bowl game since 1985 last year.

But this game's significance is no longer in the wins and losses but rather the unique storyline of men whose letter of intent is a commitment and sacrifice that dwarfs their peers at programs all across the country. One day a year we celebrate these individuals, what they stand for, and the rich history of the game. Thanks to CBS and Showtime, we'll get to extend this celebration and gain a deeper understanding and appreciation as today they announced a documentary series on the lead up to the game.

"With crews embedding with the teams, CBS Sports.com on Monday, Oct. 17 will kick off 10 weekly webisodes surrounding the two service academies. 

A preview of the docu-drama is scheduled for No. 23 on Showtime with encores to follow, while CBS will air the network television premiere on Saturday, Dec. 3, a week before the academies renew their rivalry, this year in Washington D.C.

A Game Of Honor, which will incorporate footage and interviews leading up to the contest, as well as action during the game and immediately thereafter, is slated to bow on Showtime on Dec. 21."

The actual release of the series is a bit confusing as you'll have webisodes, a making of special, a CBS series, and then a 2 hour documentary if I am reading this correctly. 

I haven't yet checked out Showtime's work on "The Franchise", but word from Giants fans is that Showtime has done a good job there.

Regardless if it's on CBS, Showtime, or relegated to webisdoes, there is definitely a lot of great stories to tell here. Why these men choose to serve, where they come from, and what their day to day lives are like all makes for great television. Both teams also have the angle of being underdogs as their football talent is definitely not on par with other D1 schools. Even though Navy has been a solid program over the years, it's hard to imagine that their physical talents and pedigree are actually the driving force behind their success. 

We'll get to see just how they're able to compete and if Army can continue their march back to respectability. Definitely a great initiative and one myself and the AA team look forward to viewing. Kudos to CBS and Showtime for picking up HBO's slack with Hard Knocks on hiatus. 

Dick Vitale, whose talking head graces our Mt. Awful Announcing Rushmore, is in Rome these days and had a chance to meet with the POPE, Pope Benedict XVI. We know this because he gave us the play-by-play via his Twitter account:  

Heading right now to the Pope's summer home hoping & praying 4 an audience with the HOLY FATHER! [...]

So EXCITED just kissed Pope's ring - in SHOCK!

(Ed. note: The last tweet was supplemented with the following photo, which looks more like SAD DickieV after a Duke loss):

I am still shaking as I have met many many famous ppl but NOTHING COMPARES when I was called 4 my moment today with POPE BENEDICT XVI! [...]

Can't wait 4 the photos taken by the Pope's staff- in awe as we made small talk .Asked his Holiness to pray 4 peace in our world & 4 my fam, [...]

@richarddeitsch Goosebumps as it was a moment that I will treasure - usually a non stop talker- I was in such awe- he started the chatter [...]

Ran into Broncos fan in hotel lobby in Rome & he claims Brady Quinn should starr- I said it is @timtebow time. [...]

(Ed. note: A Tim Tebow tweet in the middle of talking about meeting the POPE could not have been a coincidence.)

Did not have the nerve but I wanted to joke around & ask the Pope who was more popular in Germany the Pope or @swish41 -Dirk Nowitzki?

That was a real diaper dandy. I'm curious - how would DickieV rank his meeting with the Pope to one with ScarJo? 

Attention football fans!  Our collective prayers have been answered by the WorldWide Leader, ESPN!  No longer will you lie awake at night wishing there was a more contrived, more complicated way to rate your favorite quarterback!  No longer will you have to wrap your pea-sized mind around a perfect 158.3 QB rating. No, no, no, ESPN is saving the day this Friday when they unveil their brand new Total Quarterback Rating.  Of course, the new Total QB Rating is only a small part of ESPN's Year of the Quarterback, which I think falls somewhere between the Year of the Tiger and the Year of the Armadillo.

Hopefully you could sense the sarcasm dripping from that paragraph, but it is true, ESPN has devised their own QB rating in their never-ending quest for world domination.  But why?  Sure, we've all complained at one point or another that a perfect QB rating of 158.3 makes no sense.  But was there really demand for a different QB rating to muddy the waters?  As SI's Kerry Byrne points out, the conventional QB rating, although contrived, actually has an excellent correlation to both individual success at the position and team success. Ask yourself, is it a fluke that Tom Brady was 1st last year in passer rating, or that Jimmy Claussen was 31st?

According to the experts at ESPN though, the arcane QB rating we're all accustomed to just doesn't reflect the demands of the "modern quarterback".  So, the "far superior" ESPN Total QB Rating will be even more impossible to understand than the current system.  From SportsNewser:

“Total QBR is based on all of a quarterback’s plays (rushing, passing, sacks, fumbles, interceptions, penalties, etc.), and it calculates the per-play net impact of the quarterback on the ability to score. Each play is weighted by the situation (i.e., down and distance, field position, time during the game) and its importance to the game’s outcome. For example, a completed five-yard pass on 3rd-and-3 would increase a quarterback’s QBR more than a five-yard completion on 3rd-and-15 because the former continues the drive and thus improves the team’s chance of scoring. Also, plays in closely contested games carry a greater value than plays in less competitive situations.

Division of credit is another important Total QBR principle because it assigns a percentage to how much credit a quarterback should get for a positive play – or blame for a negative play. With (Trent) Dilfer’s input, the group identified other key data to incorporate into the formula, including how far a pass travels in the air, where the ball was thrown on the field, the yards after catch, and whether the quarterback was facing defensive pressure, among other factors."

Oh great, so Trent Dilfer helped create this system!  That means Bears QB Jay Cutler will automatically start out with a -9334 Total QB Rating on ESPN's new 100 point scale.  Seriously though, has there ever been an analyst that carries himself with more self-importance and accomplished less than Trent Dilfer?  And before you tell me that Dilfer has a Super Bowl ring let me remind you that I could have won a Super Bowl with that Ravens defense.  When did he become the ultimate authority on quarterbacking?  If there's anyone I WOULDN'T trust with developing a new QB rating, it's Trent Dilfer because you know he has a bias against certain QBs (Jay Cutler) and also has his favorites (Mark Sanchez, Aaron Rogers, Philip Rivers... basically everyone but Jay Cutler.  Yes, I'm a Bears fan).

And as if having Trent Dilfer create this new QB rating weren't bad enough, other ESPNers like Ron Jaworski (who probably spent 800 consecutive hours in the "vault" studying QBs who "could make all the throws") and Jon Gruden are involved in the project.  I'm sorry, but does Gruden have any credibility himself in this new QB rating?  I think a QB would literally have to throw an INT with every attempt to get a poor rating if "THAT GUY" is involved with this new metric.  Apparently the only person missing from the braintrust behind this new Total QB Rating is noted NFL "expert" Colin Cowherd.  So long passer rating, it was nice knowing you and your quirky 158.3 perfect rating.  Brace yourselves NFL fans, Total QB Rating is here to stay, because ESPN says so.  And the jamming down our throats begins this Friday!
 

Joe Morgan Memorial Tournament "Elite 8" finisher Skip Bayless has more problems than just his daily arguments with the insufferable Rob Parker. On last night's Conan, The Big Pundit decided that the next episode of Shaq Vs. would be him against that troll, Skip Bayless. This bizarre feud started soon after Shaq's retirement was announced and Skip acted very Skip Baylessy by saying Shaq's career didn't live up to the expectations he had for his career out of college on the sports theater debate show, 1st and 10.

Last night wasn't the first time Neon called out Skip. At his retirement press conference, he also mentioned Skip by name.

This will make me feel dirty, but I support blowhards like Skip Bayless being able to have an opinion on Shaq. I certainly don't agree with Skip at all on Shaq's career being a disappointment, but if only those who are 4x NBA champions or perennial all-stars are able to have a dissenting opinion than that really just doesn't work out for me. There are plenty of well-respected analysts that either did not play professionally or were never stars. Being an analyst and an athlete are two completely different jobs. Obviously having the experience to know what you are talking about first hand goes a very long way, but that doesn't necessarily make you a good analyst.

Whatever. Skip's still awful and on my tournament bracket I had him penciled in to the Final 4. If Shaq is really upset and feels the need to bust out some of his legendary martial arts moves and he Shaq-Fu's Skip off the air, fans of rational thinking would be grateful.

We had such a good time corralling the AA staff together last week to give our writers' picks for the Joe Morgan Memorial Tournament Final that we've reconvened around the virtual AA roundtable once again.  Ryan's article on the new 30 for 30 slate got us thinking about which sports stories we'd like to see given the 30 for 30 treatment.  I'm sure the higher ups at ESPN take note and these ideas will hit the small screen soon...

Question: What sports story of the last 30 years would you love to see made into a 30 for 30 documentary and how would you tell it?

Matt Yoder: As an insane Saints fan, my choice is a bit biased.  The story of the New Orleans Saints and the city of New Orleans, from August 29, 2005 when Hurricane Katrina made landfall in Louisiana to February 7, 2010 when the Saints won Super Bowl XLIV is one of the most remarkable in sports and would be perfect for ESPN's 30 for 30.

The central narrative would be the relationship between the team and the community and how the building of the Saints championship team paralleled the rebuilding of New Orleans.  The Saints and their city have a unique relationship that is rarely seen in the days of franchises continually turning their backs on fans, free agency, and the gulf between fan and athlete becoming wider.  With the Saints returning to New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, an already passionate fan base became irrevocably intertwined with their team.  The Saints' uplifting Super Bowl victory may have been one of the most meaningful to a particular community in history.  Because let's face it, if the New Orleans Saints can win the Super Bowl, then anything is possible.

Brady Green: I would really like to see a documentary on Bill James and the rise of sabermetrics in baseball.  For better and worse, baseball hasn’t changed much since its beginnings. Out of all sports, baseball places the highest importance on stats when assessing a player’s value and up until somewhat recently, only a few stats were usually used.

Bill James didn’t agree with this, and took his obsession of baseball to another stratosphere of nerdom by creating an array of new stats in his Baseball Almanac. These Almanacs were largely made for other baseball tri-lambs that obviously represented an extreme minority of baseball fans. Still, those few fans and even GM’s that took the time to read them started to think about baseball in a completely different way. Personally, this reinvigorated my interest in baseball, once again making it my favorite professional sport. I love hearing the debate on both sides (I’m still somewhere in the middle) and I crack up whenever SportsCenter compares a player's WAR (wins above replacement) stat every couple of months. GM’s all over the league (not just in Oakland) have been influenced by sabermetrics. It even landed James a job in the Sawks front office in 2003, which he still has today.

FOX, we may have found Joe Buck's replacement with Mets Kidscaster, Jacob Resnick.  Every year the Mets allow a kid to call an inning of a game and for the second year in a row they were lucky enough to get to use their Home Run call. Below is Resnick's call (THANKS MLB! EMBEDDABLE MEDIA FTW!)

 

Come on, you know your soft side enjoyed that. Good tone and pace as well as delivering specifics like "solo shot" "breaking ball" and "left field seats". Getting all those details into a smooth call is probably easier said than done. With that in mind, this was a job well done and something tells me Resnick is absolutely going to dominate his Bar Mitzvah.