Predators Cameraman Lit Up During Pregame Entrance
H/T The Big Lead
[NY Daily News]
***UPDATE II: Diane Pucin of the Los Angeles Times has this to add...
Two people familiar with the negotiations but not authorized to speak publicly said Johnson and CBS have so far been unable to agree on a new contract and that he now is in discussions with Fox. One of the sources said Johnson is discussing "a significant role" in Fox's college football coverage, which has recently been expanded with the Pac-12 and Big 12.
The LA Times report does not mention a possible NFL role for Fox, does not say that Gus is necessarily "finished" at CBS, and leaves the negotiations open-ended and more ambiguous than the other reports we've seen thus far. One thing I think is for sure, we'll find out just how much Gus' popularity with fans will carry over to network executives. With Jim Nantz firmly placed at the top of CBS' football and college basketball coverage, a move to Fox may provide Gus more opportunities at the top of the marquee, but leave him missing during March Madness.
***UPDATE III: We reached out to Fox for a comment, and this is what they had to say...
"Gus is a terrific talent, but we have nothing to announce at this time."
Memo Caldera Gus Johnson leaving March Madness may be the end of college basketball. He was one of about three reasons why I even watched it to begin with. Also, who is Steve Tasker going to be with? Those two were Peanut Butter and Jam!
Chaz Bryant Shocking but I have a feeling he'll show up at Fox. I like how CBS presents sports, but he wasn't going anywhere at CBS with Nantz. I think he can easy be #2 at Fox for the NFL but they'll place him at #3, but when they start their college football coverage IMO I would make him #1 games on big Fox and FX, plus lead on college b-ball on FX.
Gus Johnson may be done at CBS, but he instantly becomes the LeBron James of announcing free agents. Let's only hope he hosts his own Decision program to tell the world where his next move will be.

SI.com has learned that CBS recently parted ways with Gus Johnson, a play-by-play mainstay on its college basketball coverage for 16 years. Johnson has also worked as a play-by-play voice for the network's NFL coverage since 1998.
The two parties could not agree on a new deal.
Industry sources said Johnson has spoken with Fox Sports about a role in its college football coverage. Fox Sports (which has a 49 percent ownership share in the Big Ten Network) recently upped its inventory of college football as part of the 12-year, $3 billion contract between the Pac-10 (soon to be the Pac-12) and ESPN and Fox.
Wooooooooow. This is perhaps the biggest announcing story of the year so far and we will be all over it at AA in the coming hours and days. It will be very, very interesting to see where Gus lands on his feet, but it's a sad story for fans of Gus and the NCAA Tournament that Johnson and CBS have parted ways. Back in January, Gus told AA that his dream job was announcing the Final Four.
"I dream about calling the Final Four and the National Championship game. As a broadcaster that’s the only thing that I’d like to do that I haven’t done. College basketball is my thing and gives me great joy. If there was one thing I’d like to do one day, and I’m still relatively young, I think one day I’d like to have the chance to do that. One day I hope that will happen."
Unfortunately, that dream seems much further away for Johnson. We'll update the story as more information is released.

NFL Network turns to Nessler, Mayock for new two-man booth - SI.com
This happened: Derrick Rose received his MVP trophy from David Stern and poor ol' Dick Stockton called Rose, "David".
David Stern to Derrick. David Stern to David... Derp. I can see how you might make that mistake - David to another D name and you're still thinking about David in some small capacity? Or maybe old-timer Dick Stockton had the American songwriter on his mind? Either way, I think it could've been worse - he could've said "touch it, Dave!"
This does raise a very serious discussion question, though. Do you prefer announcers to stop and correct themselves (assuming they even catch it) or do you prefer the ol' theater approach - carry on and hope nobody heard you miss/screw up your line(s)? ... I'd probably say it depends on the announcing situation. With something this big - the presentation of the freaking MVP trophy, which has a chance of being replayed over and over again - an announcer better be pretty darn sure they're calling the MVP by the right name. Or at least conscious enough of what they're saying, so they can stop themselves if need be and say, "oh, pisssss, I meant Derrick ... Derrick Rose with the MVP!"
video via
The LA Angels and Boston Red Sox played 13 innings on Wednesday/Thursday, in a game that lasted nearly eight hours and ended just before my bedtime at 3 a.m. EST, thanks in large part to Sox tradition and a two-plus hour rain delay in the middle of the game.
As you might imagine, everyone who opted to stay for its entirety got a little stir crazy by game's finish, announcers included. I mean, things really started to get weird - fans' eyes were bleeding, heckling was getting audibly meaner as cuss words were getting picked up on both broadcasts, some fans were begging Nomar Garciaparra (who was up in the ESPN booth) to come down and pitch, and a few others of the hundred or so remaining Sox fans were even chanting "Yankees Suck" despite the fact the Sox were playing, you know, the Angels. And Brick killed a guy.
Meanwhile, up in the Angels broadcast booth, announcers Victor Rojas and Mike Gubicza decided to put on wrestling masks for an entire inning to ignite a rally that would end this test of endurance once and for all:

I was getting kind of nervous because I didn't know what was going on, but Bobby Abreu dressed like Gene Simmons from Kiss and knocked in two runs on a two-out single to cheer me up. He's the sweetest person in the world.

As it turns out, the wrestling mask will be a promotional giveaway on May 10. The boys in the booth dipped into their bag of tricks a little early to make sure this game didn't last until May 10. Thankfully, the Angels didn't blow another lead in the bottom half of the inning like they did in the 9th, leaving the somewhat premature exposure of the rally wrestling masks victor-Rojas-ious...

On Tuesday, ESPN spokesman Josh Krulewitz explained in an email, "This is not common in ESPN agreements because this UT network is so unique/new for us ...The provision does not allow for random replacement of commentators or reaction to critical comments... it's more about potential situations where a commentator makes completely inappropriate comments or gets involved in inappropriate actions."
ESPN, which owns the network, will build a multi-million dollar studio in Austin, and hire network personnel... is handing over to the University of Texas the power to terminate any talent that "does not reflect the quality and reputation desired by UT for the network..." Consider me flabbergasted! ESPN is basically wrapping their integrity in a burnt-orange gift box and burying it in Austin. The response from ESPN is nonsensical. Is ESPN not capable of disciplining its own talent for completely inappropriate comments or actions on their own?? Does Texas justice imply something different? The issue is that what Texas considers inappropriate comments or actions, what ESPN considers, and what fans consider will be markedly different. Will a critical interpretation of a loss be considered inappropriate by the university? ESPN says no, will Texas say yes? How about a report on an arrest or NCAA violations? Why can't a company as massive as ESPN decide for itself what inappropriate comments or actions are fireable offenses for its own employees? Will these reporters and on-air personalities actually be working for ESPN or Texas, or does anybody even know?
Now, let's be real. Is what the Longhorn Network does in the grand scheme of things a big deal to most sports fans outside of Texas? No. It's no mystery that personalities on the Longhorn Network should be pro-Texas. It doesn't take a chemical engineering student to get that. However, the real issue is how deeply ESPN is climbing into bed with the University of Texas (insert that's what she said joke here). This is a new frontier for college sports. If ESPN is giving Texas the power to fire people hired by ESPN, what impact will that have on the company at large and the way it treats the university? I don't care if it's the Longhorn Network or not, that's a disconcerting step into uncharted waters. Let's say Kirk Herbstreit isn't too fond of Mack Brown's coaching - can he be truthful without upsetting Longhorn Network, and thus ESPN brass? Let's say Mark May comes on the LN to cheerlead... does he then go back to giving real analysis on College Football Live? On second thought, maybe we can permanently banish Mark May to the Texas channel. Will any negative criticism on College Gameday towards Texas hurt the brand of the Longhorn Network in the eyes of ESPN? Will the SportsCenter theme be replaced with this??
As many may know, we here at AA not only delight in announcing from here in the good old USA, but also around the world. But, I think it's safe to say today may bring us the first, and last announcing highlight from the world of cricket in Great Britain. Apparently cricket commentator Edward Bevan was announcing your standard, boring cricket match in Wales when a ball was crushed by Somerset's Peter Trego. Listen to the clip below as Bevan announces the flight of the ball heading for the commentary box, realizes it's about to hit him, and then does!
[BBC News]

|
|
Awful Announcing
|
|
|
The Outside Corner
|
|
|
The Outside Corner
|
|
|
Awful Announcing
|
|
|
This Given Sunday
|